SorenDayton.com

Merely an aggregation of a dispersed life online

Skip to: Content | Sidebar | Footer

Category: Ethics

Pelosi: Time to drain the swamp and get rid of Charlie Rangel

30 October, 2009 (11:22) | Ethics, Redstate, Syndicated | By: soren

Yesterday, the Washington Post broke a blockbuster. A memo was leaked detailing all the current House Ethics Committee investigations. And guess what, most of them are Democrats. In fact, the only Republican mentioned in it was Sam Graves, who has been cleared by the Committee.

So what did we learn? The Post says, regarding the inquiry of lawmakers tied to PMA, a now defunct lobbying shop, that “the inquiry was broader than initially believed”. And we learned that there is yet another investigation of Charlie Rangel:

Ethics committee staff members have interviewed House Ways and Means Chairman Charles B. Rangel (D-N.Y.) about one element of the complex investigation of his personal finances, as well as the lawmaker’s top aide and his son. Rangel said he spoke with ethics committee staff members regarding a conference that he and four other members of the Congressional Black Caucus attended last November in St. Martin. The trip initially was said to be sponsored by a nonprofit foundation run by a newspaper. But the three-day event, at a luxury resort, was underwritten by major corporations such as Citigroup, Pfizer and AT&T. Rules passed in 2007, shortly after Democrats reclaimed the majority following a wave of corruption cases against Republicans, bar private companies from paying for congressional travel.

This is in addition to all the other problems that Rangel has, including his not disclosing bank accounts, breaking New York City laws about rent control, and his holding hostage Puerto Rican grandmas for his rum buddies.

David Corn at Politics Daily has a smart take that Rangel will ultimately become a symbol of a corrupt Democratic Congress and Nancy Pelosi’s broken promise to drain the swamp.

Why might the Post article and this widening investigation of ties between lawmakers and lobbyists — neither of which relate to Rangel — matter for him? Though the probe has not yet found any of these House members guilty of wrongdoing, this episode will place pressure on Pelosi and her colleagues to show they’re not a party of sleaze. Consequently, Rangel is more vulnerable to the Republican’s campaign against him. If the PMA investigation heats up, he would make a great sacrificial lamb. And if the GOP continues to pursue Rangel, his party, burdened by this other ethics investigation, will have a tougher time protecting him.

Bad scandal day

28 November, 2007 (18:13) | Ethics | By: soren

So this morning was the Mitt Romney’s hypocritical bigotry towards Muslims scandal.
Then the Boston Herald broke that Romney’s affirmative-action judge had screwed up and let out a child-rapist before Romney gave her a promotion.
And now Rudy Giuliani was making New York City pay for his affair?
Proud day to be a Republican.

Stock tactic: Sleazy bigoted phone calls

18 November, 2007 (16:03) | Ethics | By: soren

The Politico’s Jonathan Martin asked one of the kings of political sleaze what he thought of the Mitt Romney phone calls. He sees a historical antecedent in the the 1960 JFK race:
Just as Bobby Kennedy was behind anti-Catholic calls and literature to Catholic Households in The 1960 Democratic Party. I smell a dirty trick. I [...]

Romney plays for the gutter; attacks Hillary over sex

5 November, 2007 (07:59) | Ethics | By: soren

I’ve been out of the country for about a week. So I come back, and start digging through the news. And I come to this ad by Mitt Romney.

Romney is classing this election up by attacking Hillary Clinton over sex with his "internship" line. I want to be clear about something.
We will lose [...]

Richardson’s employees giving to their boss

17 October, 2007 (10:57) | Ethics | By: soren

You don’t often get to write this sentence, so I had to do it:

State of New Mexico
$277,230

University of New Mexico
$31,950

[...]

Hillary’s pork: Crowdsourcing project for the GOP

9 October, 2007 (15:11) | Ethics | By: soren

Yesterday, Kevin Hassett, an economist at AEI and a member of John McCain’s economics team, pointed out something that we forget. Hillary Clinton is a big ole porker:
Democrats have been so busy preparing the coronation of Hillary Clinton that they have failed to train a critical eye on her record.
When it comes to earmarks, [...]

Clarity on Clinton

9 October, 2007 (14:59) | Ethics | By: soren

Andrew Sullivan makes a powerful argument against Hillary Clinton:
A thief and liar is hired by Clinton. But his thievery is less important to Clinton than his loyalty. After all, his theft was an attempt to keep president Clinton’s failures with respect to al Qaeda under wraps. And so he gets a pardon. Remember: the Clintons [...]

Ironies of the Hsu scandal

16 September, 2007 (20:33) | Ethics | By: soren

I keep giggling whenever I read about the Norman Hsu scandal.
First, Fred Thompson got it right. Didn’t the Clinton’s learn anything from the fundraising scandals of the 90s?
Second, the first great fundraising scandal of the post-Abramoff ethics era is about an illegal donor. He didn’t give money for ideological reasons. He gave money so [...]

Cheating Patriots fans?

12 September, 2007 (22:58) | Ethics | By: soren

Is Rob Bluey accusing Mitt Romney’s former driver, Dean Barnett, of defending cheating? Never…

Wow. Returning $850k

10 September, 2007 (23:57) | Ethics | By: soren

How many candidates could take this hit to their CoH? The Clintons may be sleazy, but they are loaded and clever too.