One of the branches of the Department of Labor that provides a real services to all Americans is the Office of Labor-Management Standards. These are the guys who make sure that labor unions are being transparent about their finances. Or they try, when the Democrats don’t cut their budget. But, for now, you get to see how unions spend their money.

For example, this spreadsheet shows 2006 disbursements by unions. It is in descending order by political disbursements. In 2006, AFL-CIO spent $41,620,583 on political activities, according to their filings with the Department of Labor.

However, in the fiscal year July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2006, they reported to the IRS on their 990 form (bottom of page 6 in the original PDF here, but you have to log into GuideStar), "direct or indirect political expenditures" of $0.00. Zero. Nothing. Now… Perhaps all the money was spent in the second half of the year. Unfortunately, I only have a free account on Guidestar, so I don’t have all the years to check the numbers.

So what? Well. IRS regs (PDF, page 8) indicate that political expenditures are taxed at, I think, the corporate rate (35%):

IRC 527(e)(2) defines "exempt function" as "the function of influencing or attempting to influence the selection, nomination, election, or appointment of any individual to any federal, state or local public office or office in a political organization, or the election of Presidential or Vice-Presidential electors, whether or not such individual or electors are selected, nominated, elected or appointed." The term also includes payment of an incumbent’s office expenses.

An IRC 501(c) organization that makes expenditures for such exempt function
activities is subject to tax under IRC 527(b)

So does that mean that AFL-CIO owes Uncle Sam $14m from 2006? Do you really believe that AFL-CIO did not engage in any political activities between July 1, 2005 and June 30, 2006?

Categories: Syndicated

Related Posts


The Strategic Failure of the Obama campaign

We are one week into Mitt Romney’s selection of Paul Ryan. A number of polls are coming out telling a variety of stories about what it means. But one thing is clear: Barack Obama’s campaign has had several significant strategic failures this summer. And they failed to define Paul Ryan out of the gate with their Mediscare tactics. And they failed to define Mitt Romney | Read More »


Another businessman for the Senate: Tom Smith

One upside of President Obama’s hostility to business is that business leaders like Senator Ron Johnson from Wisconsin have come forward to share their experience. Tom Smith, the Republican Senate nominee in Pennsylvania is one of them. He is endorsed by Pat Toomey. He is up against Bobby Casey, a career politician son of a career politician. But at least his dad was willing to | Read More »


Looking downballot in Massachusetts: Tom Keyes

For the next several months, we are going to be focusing, naturally, on the Presidential race, Senate races, House races, and governor’s races. However, what happens down ballot is important too. And there is a lot of hope down ballot when we look around the country. Over the next several months, I hope to highlight races in unexpected places where Republicans can put points on | Read More »