<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A brokered convention?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sorendayton.com/2007/12/11/a-brokered-convention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/12/11/a-brokered-convention/</link>
	<description>Merely an aggregation of a dispersed life online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:32:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Volunteer Voters &#187; Who Would A Brokered Convention Help?</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/12/11/a-brokered-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>Volunteer Voters &#187; Who Would A Brokered Convention Help?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/12/11/a-brokered-convention/#comment-774</guid>
		<description>[...] In the event that no candidate gets the nomination sown up on the Republican side via the primaries, Soren Dayton argues that Rudy Guiliani would have the most to lose: I also think that an unbound convention creates a situation in which it will be very, very hard for a pro-choice candidate to win. Of course, convention delegates selected in this process are even less straightforward than they would normally be. But my gut is that there would be a lot of hostility to a pro-choice candidate. Giuliani would have more luck with the Republican electorate at large than a convention electorate.   Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the event that no candidate gets the nomination sown up on the Republican side via the primaries, Soren Dayton argues that Rudy Guiliani would have the most to lose: I also think that an unbound convention creates a situation in which it will be very, very hard for a pro-choice candidate to win. Of course, convention delegates selected in this process are even less straightforward than they would normally be. But my gut is that there would be a lot of hostility to a pro-choice candidate. Giuliani would have more luck with the Republican electorate at large than a convention electorate.   Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colecurtis</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/12/11/a-brokered-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>colecurtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/12/11/a-brokered-convention/#comment-773</guid>
		<description>I absolutely agree with this anaysis and I agree that Sen. McCain can and will survive, but can Giuliani with his $400,000.00 security problems and his New York style politics that is reminiscent of the old shell game of now you see it now you don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely agree with this anaysis and I agree that Sen. McCain can and will survive, but can Giuliani with his $400,000.00 security problems and his New York style politics that is reminiscent of the old shell game of now you see it now you don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

