<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gage responds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sorendayton.com/2007/11/19/gage-responds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/11/19/gage-responds/</link>
	<description>Merely an aggregation of a dispersed life online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:32:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eye</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/11/19/gage-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/11/19/gage-responds/#comment-672</guid>
		<description>Pretty hard to sue news organizations for libel. I don&#039;t think that they got anywhere near the lines.

Questions do indeed have to be answered. This denial is unserious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty hard to sue news organizations for libel. I don&#8217;t think that they got anywhere near the lines.</p>
<p>Questions do indeed have to be answered. This denial is unserious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad Jayhawk</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/11/19/gage-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad Jayhawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 05:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/11/19/gage-responds/#comment-671</guid>
		<description>BTW I got banned from Redstate for suggesting Gage should sue them.  Thinskinned?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW I got banned from Redstate for suggesting Gage should sue them.  Thinskinned?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad Jayhawk</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/11/19/gage-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad Jayhawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 05:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/11/19/gage-responds/#comment-670</guid>
		<description>Gage should sue Redstate for libel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gage should sue Redstate for libel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ee2793</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/11/19/gage-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>ee2793</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/11/19/gage-responds/#comment-669</guid>
		<description>&quot;Commenters?&quot;  Try sockpuppets. And you can&#039;t prove otherwise.  McCain/Rudy dirty tricksters all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Commenters?&#8221;  Try sockpuppets. And you can&#8217;t prove otherwise.  McCain/Rudy dirty tricksters all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sampo</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/11/19/gage-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator>sampo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/11/19/gage-responds/#comment-668</guid>
		<description>ee2793,
I sense some kind of disconnect. If your candidate is so great, why do you need to attack commenters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ee2793,<br />
I sense some kind of disconnect. If your candidate is so great, why do you need to attack commenters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ee2793</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/11/19/gage-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>ee2793</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 02:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/11/19/gage-responds/#comment-667</guid>
		<description>What a freak show this website it, between sambo and Charlie Wilson it&#039;s like Halloween.  What will you do when Mitt&#039;s the nominee?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a freak show this website it, between sambo and Charlie Wilson it&#8217;s like Halloween.  What will you do when Mitt&#8217;s the nominee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neil</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/11/19/gage-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/11/19/gage-responds/#comment-666</guid>
		<description>&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Notice that he never defined “this.” &lt;/i&gt;

Sure he did, he defined it as a push-poll. Which by all accounts, this wasn&#039;t. Sloppy language will give them plausible deniability any time.

&lt;i&gt;Imagine the smoke screen a President Romney would put up if a real scandal broke!&lt;/i&gt;

No more than would any other President, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Notice that he never defined “this.” </i></p>
<p>Sure he did, he defined it as a push-poll. Which by all accounts, this wasn&#8217;t. Sloppy language will give them plausible deniability any time.</p>
<p><i>Imagine the smoke screen a President Romney would put up if a real scandal broke!</i></p>
<p>No more than would any other President, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Wilson</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/11/19/gage-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/11/19/gage-responds/#comment-665</guid>
		<description>sorry, bad coding. Trying again:

&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;TargetPoint Consulting has NEVER and will NEVER conduct a push-poll. TargetPoint is in the business of promoting Governor Romney, not manufacturing fantasy plots that involve smearing him.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

You say to-MAY-to, I say to-MAH-to. So it wasn’t “push polling” but it was “message testing,” right?

&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;we would have told him on the record that TargetPoint Consulting had nothing to do with this&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

It all depends on what “this” is, doesn’t it? Notice that he never defined “this.” And notice that he sidestepped the question of a relationship between Target Point and Western Wats.

&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;We can only hope in the future that National Review will be more consistently involved in reporting the news, and not taking off on detours into the fever-swamps of loony conspiracies.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

Yes, and WE can only hope that in the future, Alex Gage, Western Wats, and Mitt Romney would tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, rather than ducking and weaving and parsing words.

Taken together, the prevarications from these characters make Bill Clinton’s behavior in the Lewinsky scandal look like that of an amateur. Maybe this sort of Swiss cheese sells in Utah, but there are 49 other states</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry, bad coding. Trying again:</p>
<p><i><b>TargetPoint Consulting has NEVER and will NEVER conduct a push-poll. TargetPoint is in the business of promoting Governor Romney, not manufacturing fantasy plots that involve smearing him.</b></i></p>
<p>You say to-MAY-to, I say to-MAH-to. So it wasn’t “push polling” but it was “message testing,” right?</p>
<p><i><b>we would have told him on the record that TargetPoint Consulting had nothing to do with this</b></i></p>
<p>It all depends on what “this” is, doesn’t it? Notice that he never defined “this.” And notice that he sidestepped the question of a relationship between Target Point and Western Wats.</p>
<p><i><b>We can only hope in the future that National Review will be more consistently involved in reporting the news, and not taking off on detours into the fever-swamps of loony conspiracies.</b></i></p>
<p>Yes, and WE can only hope that in the future, Alex Gage, Western Wats, and Mitt Romney would tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, rather than ducking and weaving and parsing words.</p>
<p>Taken together, the prevarications from these characters make Bill Clinton’s behavior in the Lewinsky scandal look like that of an amateur. Maybe this sort of Swiss cheese sells in Utah, but there are 49 other states</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Wilson</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/11/19/gage-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/11/19/gage-responds/#comment-664</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;TargetPoint Consulting has NEVER and will NEVER conduct a push-poll. TargetPoint is in the business of promoting Governor Romney, not manufacturing fantasy plots that involve smearing him.&lt;/i&gt;

You say to-MAY-to, I say to-MAH-to. So it wasn&#039;t &quot;push polling&quot; but it was &quot;message testing,&quot; right?

&lt;i&gt;we would have told him on t&lt;i&gt;he record that TargetPoint Consulting had nothing to do with this&lt;/i&gt;

It all depends on what &quot;this&quot; is, doesn&#039;t it? Notice that he never defined &quot;this.&quot; And notice that he sidestepped the question of a relationship between Target Point and Western Wats.

&lt;i&gt;We can only hope in the future that National Review will be more consistently involved in reporting the news, and not taking off on detours into the fever-swamps of loony conspiracies.&lt;/i&gt;

Yes, and WE can only hope that in the future, Alex Gage, Western Wats, and Mitt Romney would tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, rather than ducking and weaving and parsing words.

Taken together, the prevarications from these characters make Bill Clinton&#039;s behavior in the Lewinsky scandal look like that of an amateur. Maybe this sort of Swiss cheese sells in Utah, but there are 49 other states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>TargetPoint Consulting has NEVER and will NEVER conduct a push-poll. TargetPoint is in the business of promoting Governor Romney, not manufacturing fantasy plots that involve smearing him.</i></p>
<p>You say to-MAY-to, I say to-MAH-to. So it wasn&#8217;t &#8220;push polling&#8221; but it was &#8220;message testing,&#8221; right?</p>
<p><i>we would have told him on t</i><i>he record that TargetPoint Consulting had nothing to do with this</i></p>
<p>It all depends on what &#8220;this&#8221; is, doesn&#8217;t it? Notice that he never defined &#8220;this.&#8221; And notice that he sidestepped the question of a relationship between Target Point and Western Wats.</p>
<p><i>We can only hope in the future that National Review will be more consistently involved in reporting the news, and not taking off on detours into the fever-swamps of loony conspiracies.</i></p>
<p>Yes, and WE can only hope that in the future, Alex Gage, Western Wats, and Mitt Romney would tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, rather than ducking and weaving and parsing words.</p>
<p>Taken together, the prevarications from these characters make Bill Clinton&#8217;s behavior in the Lewinsky scandal look like that of an amateur. Maybe this sort of Swiss cheese sells in Utah, but there are 49 other states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sampo</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/11/19/gage-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator>sampo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/11/19/gage-responds/#comment-663</guid>
		<description>Imagine the smoke screen a President Romney would put up if a real scandal broke!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine the smoke screen a President Romney would put up if a real scandal broke!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

