<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Romney plays for the gutter; attacks Hillary over sex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sorendayton.com/2007/11/05/romney-plays-for-the-gutter-attacks-hillary-over-sex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/11/05/romney-plays-for-the-gutter-attacks-hillary-over-sex/</link>
	<description>Merely an aggregation of a dispersed life online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 16:24:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eyeon08.com &#187; How to Beat the Bitch</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/11/05/romney-plays-for-the-gutter-attacks-hillary-over-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>eyeon08.com &#187; How to Beat the Bitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/11/05/romney-plays-for-the-gutter-attacks-hillary-over-sex/#comment-586</guid>
		<description>[...] Where &quot;bitch&quot; clearly means &quot;Hillary Rodham Clinton.&quot; John McCain gives the answer. With respect and dignity. Unlike Mitt Romney&#8217;s attacking her over sex. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Where &quot;bitch&quot; clearly means &quot;Hillary Rodham Clinton.&quot; John McCain gives the answer. With respect and dignity. Unlike Mitt Romney&#8217;s attacking her over sex. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eyeon08.com: &#8220;Mitt Romney should be ashamed of himself, not that he’s capable of that. And not that he’s at any risk of winning the presidency anyways.&#8221; &#171; who is willard milton romney?</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/11/05/romney-plays-for-the-gutter-attacks-hillary-over-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>eyeon08.com: &#8220;Mitt Romney should be ashamed of himself, not that he’s capable of that. And not that he’s at any risk of winning the presidency anyways.&#8221; &#171; who is willard milton romney?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/11/05/romney-plays-for-the-gutter-attacks-hillary-over-sex/#comment-585</guid>
		<description>[...] Nov 7, 2007 in 2008, GOP, campaign communications, campaign communiques, campaign literature, campaign management, election 2008, gaffs and pratfalls, incompetence, mitt romney, republicans, rhetoric, romney, strategy, stupidity, the dark soul of Mitt Romney, triumph of unreasonTags: blaming, eyeon08.com, language of blame, president bill clinton, scolding, Sen. Hillary Clinton   &#8230; &#8220;Romney is classing this election up by attacking Hillary Clinton over sex with his &#8220;internship&#8221; line. I want to be clear about something, writes eye in an eyeon08.com post titled Romney plays for the gutter; attacks Hillary over sex We will lose with this kind of behavior. We will get crushed with this kind of behavior. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nov 7, 2007 in 2008, GOP, campaign communications, campaign communiques, campaign literature, campaign management, election 2008, gaffs and pratfalls, incompetence, mitt romney, republicans, rhetoric, romney, strategy, stupidity, the dark soul of Mitt Romney, triumph of unreasonTags: blaming, eyeon08.com, language of blame, president bill clinton, scolding, Sen. Hillary Clinton   &#8230; &#8220;Romney is classing this election up by attacking Hillary Clinton over sex with his &#8220;internship&#8221; line. I want to be clear about something, writes eye in an eyeon08.com post titled Romney plays for the gutter; attacks Hillary over sex We will lose with this kind of behavior. We will get crushed with this kind of behavior. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Because She’s a Woman? &#124; No Hillary Clinton</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/11/05/romney-plays-for-the-gutter-attacks-hillary-over-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>Because She’s a Woman? &#124; No Hillary Clinton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 00:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/11/05/romney-plays-for-the-gutter-attacks-hillary-over-sex/#comment-584</guid>
		<description>[...] Adam Nagourney and Patrick Healy ask suggestively in yesterday&#8217;s New York Times whether there are &#8220;[d]ifferent rules when a rival is a woman?&#8221; Having worked in politics for a long time I can tell you that there most certainly is a different set of rules (for example, unfunny jokes about her husband&#8217;s sex life should be off limits, if a Republican victory is the goal). That said, playing the victim card is always a risky push back strategy. Nevertheless, the Hillary forces play it for all it&#8217;s worth: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Adam Nagourney and Patrick Healy ask suggestively in yesterday&rsquo;s New York Times whether there are &ldquo;[d]ifferent rules when a rival is a woman?&rdquo; Having worked in politics for a long time I can tell you that there most certainly is a different set of rules (for example, unfunny jokes about her husband&rsquo;s sex life should be off limits, if a Republican victory is the goal). That said, playing the victim card is always a risky push back strategy. Nevertheless, the Hillary forces play it for all it&rsquo;s worth: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankle Biting Pundits</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/11/05/romney-plays-for-the-gutter-attacks-hillary-over-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankle Biting Pundits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 10:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/11/05/romney-plays-for-the-gutter-attacks-hillary-over-sex/#comment-583</guid>
		<description>[...] Adam Nagourney and Patrick Healy ask suggestively in yesterday’s New York Times whether there are “[d]ifferent rules when a rival is a woman?” Having worked in politics for a long time I can tell you that there most certainly is a different set of rules (for example, unfunny jokes about her husband’s sex life should be off limits, if a Republican victory is the goal). That said, playing the victim card is always a risky push back strategy. Nevertheless, the Hillary forces play it for all it’s worth: Some of Mrs. Clinton’s supporters are accusing rival candidates and the questioners of “piling on,” to use the words of the Clinton campaign, at the debate, which rattled the Clinton camp. They noted that John Edwards had been especially critical of Mrs. Clinton. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Adam Nagourney and Patrick Healy ask suggestively in yesterday’s New York Times whether there are “[d]ifferent rules when a rival is a woman?” Having worked in politics for a long time I can tell you that there most certainly is a different set of rules (for example, unfunny jokes about her husband’s sex life should be off limits, if a Republican victory is the goal). That said, playing the victim card is always a risky push back strategy. Nevertheless, the Hillary forces play it for all it’s worth: Some of Mrs. Clinton’s supporters are accusing rival candidates and the questioners of “piling on,” to use the words of the Clinton campaign, at the debate, which rattled the Clinton camp. They noted that John Edwards had been especially critical of Mrs. Clinton. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eye</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/11/05/romney-plays-for-the-gutter-attacks-hillary-over-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 02:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/11/05/romney-plays-for-the-gutter-attacks-hillary-over-sex/#comment-582</guid>
		<description>Stop being deliberately ignorant. This is the third time this attack has happened.

We will lose if we do this.

We need candidates who don&#039;t roll around in the mud with the pigs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop being deliberately ignorant. This is the third time this attack has happened.</p>
<p>We will lose if we do this.</p>
<p>We need candidates who don&#8217;t roll around in the mud with the pigs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ee2793</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/11/05/romney-plays-for-the-gutter-attacks-hillary-over-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>ee2793</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 01:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/11/05/romney-plays-for-the-gutter-attacks-hillary-over-sex/#comment-581</guid>
		<description>Dear pro-amnesty Hillary lover,
To the reasonable viewer, the ad highlight&#039;s MR&#039;s experience.  Way to miss the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear pro-amnesty Hillary lover,<br />
To the reasonable viewer, the ad highlight&#8217;s MR&#8217;s experience.  Way to miss the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neil</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/11/05/romney-plays-for-the-gutter-attacks-hillary-over-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/11/05/romney-plays-for-the-gutter-attacks-hillary-over-sex/#comment-580</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t claim to know anything about whether your claims are true or not, but didn&#039;t the Clintons undergo a rather substantial financial investigation throughout the &#039;90s which failed to turn anything up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t claim to know anything about whether your claims are true or not, but didn&#8217;t the Clintons undergo a rather substantial financial investigation throughout the &#8217;90s which failed to turn anything up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
