<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Economist on CNP meeting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sorendayton.com/2007/10/01/economist-on-cnp-meeting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/10/01/economist-on-cnp-meeting/</link>
	<description>Merely an aggregation of a dispersed life online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:08:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Volunteer Voters &#187; Would A Christian Right Third Party Challenge Actually Increase the Power Of The Religious Right In The GOP?</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/10/01/economist-on-cnp-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Volunteer Voters &#187; Would A Christian Right Third Party Challenge Actually Increase the Power Of The Religious Right In The GOP?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 20:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/10/01/economist-on-cnp-meeting/#comment-454</guid>
		<description>[...] There is certainly an argument for it: At this point it looks like a Democrat, Hillary or otherwise, is going to win this election regardless. If Christian conservatives can argue that by withholding their support they caused the GOP to lose, they will enjoy more leverage in future, more winnable elections. It’ll be hard for moderate Republicans to take their marching orders from Tony Perkins but they have, after all, volunteered for and nurtured the relationship.   Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There is certainly an argument for it: At this point it looks like a Democrat, Hillary or otherwise, is going to win this election regardless. If Christian conservatives can argue that by withholding their support they caused the GOP to lose, they will enjoy more leverage in future, more winnable elections. It’ll be hard for moderate Republicans to take their marching orders from Tony Perkins but they have, after all, volunteered for and nurtured the relationship.   Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: race42008.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on the Third Party Effort to Stop Rudy</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/10/01/economist-on-cnp-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>race42008.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on the Third Party Effort to Stop Rudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 00:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/10/01/economist-on-cnp-meeting/#comment-453</guid>
		<description>[...] Soren Dayton links to this Economist post that I think encapsulates the rationale behind the third party effort being discussed by prominent social conservatives: &#8230;at this point it looks like a Democrat, Hillary or otherwise, is going to win this election regardless. If Christian conservatives can argue that by withholding their support they caused the GOP to lose, they will enjoy more leverage in future, more winnable elections. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Soren Dayton links to this Economist post that I think encapsulates the rationale behind the third party effort being discussed by prominent social conservatives: &#8230;at this point it looks like a Democrat, Hillary or otherwise, is going to win this election regardless. If Christian conservatives can argue that by withholding their support they caused the GOP to lose, they will enjoy more leverage in future, more winnable elections. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
