<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two new Iraq talking points?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sorendayton.com/2007/09/27/two-new-iraq-talking-points/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/09/27/two-new-iraq-talking-points/</link>
	<description>Merely an aggregation of a dispersed life online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:32:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: neil</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/09/27/two-new-iraq-talking-points/comment-page-1/#comment-1412</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/27/two-new-iraq-talking-points/#comment-1412</guid>
		<description>Nothing other than that urging an end to the war. At any rate, you can bet that Republicans up for reelection will be saying that their vote represented progress towards pulling out troops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing other than that urging an end to the war. At any rate, you can bet that Republicans up for reelection will be saying that their vote represented progress towards pulling out troops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sampo</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/09/27/two-new-iraq-talking-points/comment-page-1/#comment-1411</link>
		<dc:creator>sampo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/27/two-new-iraq-talking-points/#comment-1411</guid>
		<description>the iraq resolution was on partitioning iraq. as far as i know it has nothing to do with pulling out troops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the iraq resolution was on partitioning iraq. as far as i know it has nothing to do with pulling out troops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

