<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s troop levels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sorendayton.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/</link>
	<description>Merely an aggregation of a dispersed life online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:08:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: neil</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/comment-page-1/#comment-1360</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/#comment-1360</guid>
		<description>As it turns out, it goes beyond not being in touch with their base: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/9/17/2261/46758&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;they are openly contemptuous of their base&lt;/a&gt;. Somehow I just can&#039;t visualize John Boehner telling a blogger that he&#039;s mad at the base because they keep asking for lower taxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As it turns out, it goes beyond not being in touch with their base: <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/9/17/2261/46758" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dailykos.com/story/2007/9/17/2261/46758?referer=');">they are openly contemptuous of their base</a>. Somehow I just can&#8217;t visualize John Boehner telling a blogger that he&#8217;s mad at the base because they keep asking for lower taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eye</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/comment-page-1/#comment-1359</link>
		<dc:creator>eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/#comment-1359</guid>
		<description>I should add that force protection will require more MPs. So some combat forces will be replaced by MPs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should add that force protection will require more MPs. So some combat forces will be replaced by MPs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eye</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/comment-page-1/#comment-1358</link>
		<dc:creator>eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/#comment-1358</guid>
		<description>My point is a political one. I don&#039;t think that, in the end, if Romney is the nominee, that is going to be that much of a difference from Romney.

McCain and Giuliani are different. And God only knows where Thompson is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is a political one. I don&#8217;t think that, in the end, if Romney is the nominee, that is going to be that much of a difference from Romney.</p>
<p>McCain and Giuliani are different. And God only knows where Thompson is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neil</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/comment-page-1/#comment-1357</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/#comment-1357</guid>
		<description>On that Petraeus chart it appears that over 100,000 troops are in combat roles. Hardly a &#039;limited number.&#039; And even granting that point, &quot;begin to withdraw troops now&quot; is fundamentally different from &quot;do not begin to withdraw troops until later.&quot;

I take your point that neither of these two options overlap with &quot;remove all troops soon&quot; which is what the anti-war left wants, though. I just don&#039;t think it&#039;s going to make much of a difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On that Petraeus chart it appears that over 100,000 troops are in combat roles. Hardly a &#8216;limited number.&#8217; And even granting that point, &#8220;begin to withdraw troops now&#8221; is fundamentally different from &#8220;do not begin to withdraw troops until later.&#8221;</p>
<p>I take your point that neither of these two options overlap with &#8220;remove all troops soon&#8221; which is what the anti-war left wants, though. I just don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going to make much of a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eye</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/comment-page-1/#comment-1356</link>
		<dc:creator>eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/#comment-1356</guid>
		<description>The Petraeus proposal is to withdraw troops too.

My point is that &quot;combat troops&quot; is a very limited number. And he has made it clear that he is totaling a pretty small number of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Petraeus proposal is to withdraw troops too.</p>
<p>My point is that &#8220;combat troops&#8221; is a very limited number. And he has made it clear that he is totaling a pretty small number of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sampo</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/comment-page-1/#comment-1355</link>
		<dc:creator>sampo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/#comment-1355</guid>
		<description>&quot;If Romney is the nominee, which is, at least, very plausible, what are the Democrats going to do if they can’t differentiate on Iraq?&quot;

Americans have more faith in Dems on every issue except the war on terror/national security. When Chris Wallace essentially accused Romney of being to the left of Clinton on Iraq he didn&#039;t fully reject it. Bottom line, if Clinton and Romney&#039;s Iraq plans are the same, Hillary wins. Let alone if Romney truly is to the left of her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If Romney is the nominee, which is, at least, very plausible, what are the Democrats going to do if they can’t differentiate on Iraq?&#8221;</p>
<p>Americans have more faith in Dems on every issue except the war on terror/national security. When Chris Wallace essentially accused Romney of being to the left of Clinton on Iraq he didn&#8217;t fully reject it. Bottom line, if Clinton and Romney&#8217;s Iraq plans are the same, Hillary wins. Let alone if Romney truly is to the left of her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neil</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/comment-page-1/#comment-1354</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/09/12/obamas-troop-levels/#comment-1354</guid>
		<description>Is this for real? You want to know how different it is really?

Obama wants to &quot;immediately begin to remove our combat troops. Not in six months or one year -- now.&quot; Petraeus wants to eventually begin to remove some combat troops starting no sooner than six months from now and possibly later.

That&#039;s pretty different, if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this for real? You want to know how different it is really?</p>
<p>Obama wants to &#8220;immediately begin to remove our combat troops. Not in six months or one year &#8212; now.&#8221; Petraeus wants to eventually begin to remove some combat troops starting no sooner than six months from now and possibly later.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s pretty different, if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
