<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carbon tax versus cap-and-trade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sorendayton.com/2007/08/02/carbon-tax-versus-cap-and-trade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/08/02/carbon-tax-versus-cap-and-trade/</link>
	<description>Merely an aggregation of a dispersed life online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:32:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eye</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/08/02/carbon-tax-versus-cap-and-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/08/02/carbon-tax-versus-cap-and-trade/#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>I think that I agree with what you are saying here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that I agree with what you are saying here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin seebach</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/08/02/carbon-tax-versus-cap-and-trade/comment-page-1/#comment-1145</link>
		<dc:creator>martin seebach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/08/02/carbon-tax-versus-cap-and-trade/#comment-1145</guid>
		<description>Bah. Emissions trading is emissions tax, just more complicated , less effective - but dressed up as something &quot;free market&quot;-ish, and thus, by association neccessarily business friendly.

Truth is, it&#039;s thought up by people who don&#039;t understand markets. What happens when more and more companies lower their emissions? Supply rises, demand falls - and prices drop. So, lower prices on emissions? This encourages the companies that hasn&#039;t lowered their emissions to just buy credit and pollute instead of cleaning up.

Either carbon is bad, and a pigouvian tax is appropriate, or it&#039;s not. The rest is just bureaucracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah. Emissions trading is emissions tax, just more complicated , less effective &#8211; but dressed up as something &#8220;free market&#8221;-ish, and thus, by association neccessarily business friendly.</p>
<p>Truth is, it&#8217;s thought up by people who don&#8217;t understand markets. What happens when more and more companies lower their emissions? Supply rises, demand falls &#8211; and prices drop. So, lower prices on emissions? This encourages the companies that hasn&#8217;t lowered their emissions to just buy credit and pollute instead of cleaning up.</p>
<p>Either carbon is bad, and a pigouvian tax is appropriate, or it&#8217;s not. The rest is just bureaucracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

