http://sorendayton.com/2007/08/01/why-foreclosures-matter-the-numbers-are-huge/ Merely an aggregation of a dispersed life online Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:32:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://sorendayton.com/2007/08/01/why-foreclosures-matter-the-numbers-are-huge/comment-page-1/#comment-1135 Bluey Blog | Robert B. Bluey » Hillary’s Savvy Pitch to Home Owners Wed, 08 Aug 2007 02:20:19 +0000 http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/08/01/why-foreclosures-matter-the-numbers-are-huge/#comment-1135 [...] Hillary clearly gets it and is smart to talk about it now, long before anyone casts a vote. As the recent RealtyTrac stats reveal, several key states have some significant foreclosure numbers. ”  Posted at 10:20 PM in Miscellanea         Save to Del.icio.us         Share on Facebook [...] [...] Hillary clearly gets it and is smart to talk about it now, long before anyone casts a vote. As the recent RealtyTrac stats reveal, several key states have some significant foreclosure numbers. ”  Posted at 10:20 PM in Miscellanea         Save to Del.icio.us         Share on Facebook [...]

]]> http://sorendayton.com/2007/08/01/why-foreclosures-matter-the-numbers-are-huge/comment-page-1/#comment-1134 The Right’s Field » Housing Blues and Swing States Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:06:28 +0000 http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/08/01/why-foreclosures-matter-the-numbers-are-huge/#comment-1134 [...] Soren Dayton has been tracking developments in the housing market and reporting on how they could impact next year’s election. His latest post on the subject makes a fairly compelling argument. Dayton looks at a number of key states — NE, CO, CA, MI, FL, OH — and compares Bush’s 2004 margin of victory/defeat with the number of foreclosures in each: So, if you assume another 6 months as bad as these 6 months (and that the rates stay relatively stable in these states), Florida, Colorado, and Michigan would have a number of foreclosing households greater than the swing of the 2004 election results in those states. [...] [...] Soren Dayton has been tracking developments in the housing market and reporting on how they could impact next year’s election. His latest post on the subject makes a fairly compelling argument. Dayton looks at a number of key states — NE, CO, CA, MI, FL, OH — and compares Bush’s 2004 margin of victory/defeat with the number of foreclosures in each: So, if you assume another 6 months as bad as these 6 months (and that the rates stay relatively stable in these states), Florida, Colorado, and Michigan would have a number of foreclosing households greater than the swing of the 2004 election results in those states. [...]

]]>