<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: North Carolina changes electoral college allocation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sorendayton.com/2007/07/27/north-carolina-changes-electoral-college-allocation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/07/27/north-carolina-changes-electoral-college-allocation/</link>
	<description>Merely an aggregation of a dispersed life online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:08:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: eyeon08.com &#187; Don&#8217;t stop electoral college reform in California!</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/07/27/north-carolina-changes-electoral-college-allocation/comment-page-1/#comment-1124</link>
		<dc:creator>eyeon08.com &#187; Don&#8217;t stop electoral college reform in California!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/07/27/north-carolina-changes-electoral-college-allocation/#comment-1124</guid>
		<description>[...] Don&#8217;t stop electoral college reform in California!   digg_url = &#039;http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/08/07/dont-stop-electoral-college-reform-in-california/&#039;;   digg_title = &#039;Don&#8217;t stop electoral college reform in California!&#039;;   digg_bodytext = &#039;Redstate&#8217;s Erick Erickson noted yesterday that the electoral college reform in North Carolina stopped because because Howard Dean realized it would give them no feet to stand on in California: The measure raced through the North Carolina State Senate, the State House was preparing to pass it and the Governor was prepared to sign it, until [...]&#039;;   digg_skin = &quot;compact&quot;;  digg_topic = &quot;politics&quot;;   ( function() { var ds=typeof digg_skin==&#039;string&#039;?digg_skin:&#039;&#039;; var h=80; var w=52; if(ds==&#039;compact&#039;) { h=18; w=120; } var u=typeof digg_url==&#039;string&#039;?digg_url:(typeof DIGG_URL==&#039;string&#039;?DIGG_URL:window.location.href); document.write(&quot;&quot;); } )()  Redstate&#8217;s Erick Erickson noted yesterday that the electoral college reform in North Carolina stopped because because Howard Dean realized it would give them no feet to stand on in California: The measure raced through the North Carolina State Senate, the State House was preparing to pass it and the Governor was prepared to sign it, until Howard Dean intervened. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Don&#8217;t stop electoral college reform in California!   digg_url = &#8216;http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/08/07/dont-stop-electoral-college-reform-in-california/&#8217;;   digg_title = &#8216;Don&#8217;t stop electoral college reform in California!&#8217;;   digg_bodytext = &#8216;Redstate&#8217;s Erick Erickson noted yesterday that the electoral college reform in North Carolina stopped because because Howard Dean realized it would give them no feet to stand on in California: The measure raced through the North Carolina State Senate, the State House was preparing to pass it and the Governor was prepared to sign it, until [...]&#8216;;   digg_skin = &#8220;compact&#8221;;  digg_topic = &#8220;politics&#8221;;   ( function() { var ds=typeof digg_skin==&#8217;string&#8217;?digg_skin:&#8221;; var h=80; var w=52; if(ds==&#8217;compact&#8217;) { h=18; w=120; } var u=typeof digg_url==&#8217;string&#8217;?digg_url:(typeof DIGG_URL==&#8217;string&#8217;?DIGG_URL:window.location.href); document.write(&#8220;&#8221;); } )()  Redstate&#8217;s Erick Erickson noted yesterday that the electoral college reform in North Carolina stopped because because Howard Dean realized it would give them no feet to stand on in California: The measure raced through the North Carolina State Senate, the State House was preparing to pass it and the Governor was prepared to sign it, until Howard Dean intervened. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eyeon08.com &#187; California splitting electoral votes too?</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/07/27/north-carolina-changes-electoral-college-allocation/comment-page-1/#comment-1123</link>
		<dc:creator>eyeon08.com &#187; California splitting electoral votes too?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/07/27/north-carolina-changes-electoral-college-allocation/#comment-1123</guid>
		<description>[...] Simply put, this would transfer 20 electors to the GOP candidate. (19 GOP congressmen, but Bush won 22 districts in 2004) What a clever idea. This is a brilliant rebuttal to the strategy that the Dems are using in North Carolina.&#160; MyDD gives a rundown of the political consequences: The difference here is that the California proposal is not going through the legislature as the North Carolina measure did, rather it has been filed for one of CA&#8217;s 2008 ballots (if it gets enough signatures) for approval by voters. Democrats control both houses of the legislature in California, so, as with so many issues, Republicans have no choice but to bypass the legislative process and go directly to the voters via a ballot measure system that is deeply flawed. The good news is that in recent years the public&#8217;s &#160;default position on ballot measures has been &quot;No;&quot; the bad news is that if the measure does make the ballot, Democrats would be forced to spend millions of dollars to defeat it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Simply put, this would transfer 20 electors to the GOP candidate. (19 GOP congressmen, but Bush won 22 districts in 2004) What a clever idea. This is a brilliant rebuttal to the strategy that the Dems are using in North Carolina.&nbsp; MyDD gives a rundown of the political consequences: The difference here is that the California proposal is not going through the legislature as the North Carolina measure did, rather it has been filed for one of CA&#8217;s 2008 ballots (if it gets enough signatures) for approval by voters. Democrats control both houses of the legislature in California, so, as with so many issues, Republicans have no choice but to bypass the legislative process and go directly to the voters via a ballot measure system that is deeply flawed. The good news is that in recent years the public&#8217;s &nbsp;default position on ballot measures has been &quot;No;&quot; the bad news is that if the measure does make the ballot, Democrats would be forced to spend millions of dollars to defeat it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Presidential Election 2008 News And Results &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sen. Schumer&#8217;s Preemptive War</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/07/27/north-carolina-changes-electoral-college-allocation/comment-page-1/#comment-1122</link>
		<dc:creator>Presidential Election 2008 News And Results &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sen. Schumer&#8217;s Preemptive War</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/07/27/north-carolina-changes-electoral-college-allocation/#comment-1122</guid>
		<description>[...] Just another reminder that the Democrats are playing to win in the Senate. In a similar vein, Democrats in N. Carolina are about to change the state&#8217;s election law so that Democrats should pick up an additional 6 electoral votes (HT race42008). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just another reminder that the Democrats are playing to win in the Senate. In a similar vein, Democrats in N. Carolina are about to change the state&rsquo;s election law so that Democrats should pick up an additional 6 electoral votes (HT race42008). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sen. Schumer&#8217;s Preemptive War &#187; ComMITTed to Romney!</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/07/27/north-carolina-changes-electoral-college-allocation/comment-page-1/#comment-1121</link>
		<dc:creator>Sen. Schumer&#8217;s Preemptive War &#187; ComMITTed to Romney!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 05:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/07/27/north-carolina-changes-electoral-college-allocation/#comment-1121</guid>
		<description>[...] Just another reminder that the Democrats are playing to win in the Senate. In a similar vein, Democrats in N. Carolina are about to change the state&#8217;s election law so that Democrats should pick up an additional 6 electoral votes (HT race42008). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just another reminder that the Democrats are playing to win in the Senate. In a similar vein, Democrats in N. Carolina are about to change the state&#8217;s election law so that Democrats should pick up an additional 6 electoral votes (HT race42008). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: race42008.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Red State No More</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/07/27/north-carolina-changes-electoral-college-allocation/comment-page-1/#comment-1120</link>
		<dc:creator>race42008.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Red State No More</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 19:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/07/27/north-carolina-changes-electoral-college-allocation/#comment-1120</guid>
		<description>[...] Think Republicans can cobble together an electoral majority by holding all of the red states in 2008 while ceding all of the blues to Democrats? Think again:  This is a huge deal. North Carolina is changing the way that it allocates its electors in the electoral college. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Think Republicans can cobble together an electoral majority by holding all of the red states in 2008 while ceding all of the blues to Democrats? Think again:  This is a huge deal. North Carolina is changing the way that it allocates its electors in the electoral college. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sampo</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/07/27/north-carolina-changes-electoral-college-allocation/comment-page-1/#comment-1119</link>
		<dc:creator>sampo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/07/27/north-carolina-changes-electoral-college-allocation/#comment-1119</guid>
		<description>Here it is. I guess it&#039;s a state-to-state thing, but Colorado at least had enough sense to let the people decide.

http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2004/11/04/FrontPage/Colorado.Electoral.College.Reform.Fails-1318677.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here it is. I guess it&#8217;s a state-to-state thing, but Colorado at least had enough sense to let the people decide.</p>
<p><a href="http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2004/11/04/FrontPage/Colorado.Electoral.College.Reform.Fails-1318677.shtml" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2004/11/04/FrontPage/Colorado.Electoral.College.Reform.Fails-1318677.shtml?referer=');">http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2004/11/04/FrontPage/Colorado.Electoral.College.Reform.Fails-1318677.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eye</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/07/27/north-carolina-changes-electoral-college-allocation/comment-page-1/#comment-1118</link>
		<dc:creator>eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/07/27/north-carolina-changes-electoral-college-allocation/#comment-1118</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s not something to be shocked about... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s not something to be shocked about&#8230; <img src='http://sorendayton.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sampo</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/07/27/north-carolina-changes-electoral-college-allocation/comment-page-1/#comment-1117</link>
		<dc:creator>sampo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/07/27/north-carolina-changes-electoral-college-allocation/#comment-1117</guid>
		<description>*shrugs*

you got me there.

I just thought i remembered reading or hearing something about that in the past. I&#039;m just pretty shocked that the system we have in place now can be changed on a whim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*shrugs*</p>
<p>you got me there.</p>
<p>I just thought i remembered reading or hearing something about that in the past. I&#8217;m just pretty shocked that the system we have in place now can be changed on a whim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eye</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/07/27/north-carolina-changes-electoral-college-allocation/comment-page-1/#comment-1116</link>
		<dc:creator>eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/07/27/north-carolina-changes-electoral-college-allocation/#comment-1116</guid>
		<description>why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sampo</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/07/27/north-carolina-changes-electoral-college-allocation/comment-page-1/#comment-1115</link>
		<dc:creator>sampo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/07/27/north-carolina-changes-electoral-college-allocation/#comment-1115</guid>
		<description>doesn&#039;t/shouldn&#039;t this require a change to the state constitution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>doesn&#8217;t/shouldn&#8217;t this require a change to the state constitution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
