<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCOTUS allows WI RTL ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sorendayton.com/2007/06/25/scotus-allows-wi-rtl-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/06/25/scotus-allows-wi-rtl-ads/</link>
	<description>Merely an aggregation of a dispersed life online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:08:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: eyeon08.com &#187; Pandering better than authenticity?</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/06/25/scotus-allows-wi-rtl-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>eyeon08.com &#187; Pandering better than authenticity?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/06/25/scotus-allows-wi-rtl-ads/#comment-998</guid>
		<description>[...] Pandering better than authenticity?   digg_url = &#039;http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/06/26/pandering-better-than-authenticity/&#039;;   digg_title = &#039;Pandering better than authenticity?&#039;;   digg_bodytext = &#039;Jennifer Rubin, over at Race42008, wrote a summary of the 2008 candidate responses to yesterday&#8217;s SCOTUS decision. At one point, she said: Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani issued statements applauding the decision. Romney made no mention of prior support of campaign finance reform but his ringing endorsement of the Court&#8217;s decision was clearly welcome news to [...]&#039;;   digg_skin = &quot;compact&quot;;  digg_topic = &quot;politics&quot;;   ( function() { var ds=typeof digg_skin==&#039;string&#039;?digg_skin:&#039;&#039;; var h=80; var w=52; if(ds==&#039;compact&#039;) { h=18; w=120; } var u=typeof digg_url==&#039;string&#039;?digg_url:(typeof DIGG_URL==&#039;string&#039;?DIGG_URL:window.location.href); document.write(&quot;&quot;); } )()  Jennifer Rubin, over at Race42008, wrote a summary of the 2008 candidate responses to yesterday&#8217;s SCOTUS decision. At one point, she said: Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani issued statements applauding the decision. Romney made no mention of prior support of campaign finance reform but his ringing endorsement of the Court&#8217;s decision was clearly welcome news to the conservative base which seems less concerned with consistency than with vocal support for their favored positions. Giuliani delayed comment until he had actually read the opinion and only after a review issued a careful statement making clear that on this point &#8211; issue ads in the heat of campaigns&#8211; he sided with the Supreme Court. As he did on partial birth abortion he seems to be taking reasoned steps which strengthen his position with conservatives without a wholesale repudiation of prior views. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pandering better than authenticity?   digg_url = &#8216;http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/06/26/pandering-better-than-authenticity/&#8217;;   digg_title = &#8216;Pandering better than authenticity?&#8217;;   digg_bodytext = &#8216;Jennifer Rubin, over at Race42008, wrote a summary of the 2008 candidate responses to yesterday&#8217;s SCOTUS decision. At one point, she said: Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani issued statements applauding the decision. Romney made no mention of prior support of campaign finance reform but his ringing endorsement of the Court&#8217;s decision was clearly welcome news to [...]&#8216;;   digg_skin = &#8220;compact&#8221;;  digg_topic = &#8220;politics&#8221;;   ( function() { var ds=typeof digg_skin==&#8217;string&#8217;?digg_skin:&#8221;; var h=80; var w=52; if(ds==&#8217;compact&#8217;) { h=18; w=120; } var u=typeof digg_url==&#8217;string&#8217;?digg_url:(typeof DIGG_URL==&#8217;string&#8217;?DIGG_URL:window.location.href); document.write(&#8220;&#8221;); } )()  Jennifer Rubin, over at Race42008, wrote a summary of the 2008 candidate responses to yesterday&#8217;s SCOTUS decision. At one point, she said: Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani issued statements applauding the decision. Romney made no mention of prior support of campaign finance reform but his ringing endorsement of the Court&rsquo;s decision was clearly welcome news to the conservative base which seems less concerned with consistency than with vocal support for their favored positions. Giuliani delayed comment until he had actually read the opinion and only after a review issued a careful statement making clear that on this point &ndash; issue ads in the heat of campaigns&ndash; he sided with the Supreme Court. As he did on partial birth abortion he seems to be taking reasoned steps which strengthen his position with conservatives without a wholesale repudiation of prior views. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Investments And Securities Fraud &#187; SCOTUS allows WI RTL ads (mutual fund information)</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/06/25/scotus-allows-wi-rtl-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-997</link>
		<dc:creator>Investments And Securities Fraud &#187; SCOTUS allows WI RTL ads (mutual fund information)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/06/25/scotus-allows-wi-rtl-ads/#comment-997</guid>
		<description>[...] SCOTUS allows WI RTL adsToday, the Supreme Court overruled a district and appellate court and allowed issue ads within the &#8230; and Roberts judgments in the future? Will that become an issue? Tags: Campaign Finance, Courts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SCOTUS allows WI RTL adsToday, the Supreme Court overruled a district and appellate court and allowed issue ads within the &#8230; and Roberts judgments in the future? Will that become an issue? Tags: Campaign Finance, Courts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
