Comments on: WSJ’s Henniger nails it on immigration

By: jbonham76

jbonham76 — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 03:33:32 +0000

Could someone explain where Romney’s supported the Z visa? That’s news to me.

By: Rachel

Rachel — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 22:30:30 +0000

You seem to argue that it is our fault all these people came here illegaly.
It is, only to the extent that we haven’t built a strong enough fence to keep them out.
Requiring people to leave after their visa expires is not a law that is insane.
Forgiving them of the crime is.

By: neil

neil — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 19:00:16 +0000

the blowtorch of opposition from Republicans to anything — from A to Z — having to do with illegal workers from Mexico or Latin America.

What about V?

By: karasoth

karasoth — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:21:18 +0000

(#1) Registration Firewalls make baby Jesus cry

(#2) Conversely. A supply of illicit labor entering the market and pushing down wages also COUNTERS a market force of innovation/efficency/higher wages/higher cost to generate the proper economic outcome

so while these immigrants can be viewed as a positive free market force it is also contrary to at least 4 other market forces and keeps them from working

By: eye

eye — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 16:28:12 +0000

Laws that are out of proportion to reality are insane.

The problem is that people want to come here. We have done everything in our power to make that attractive.

Now, in addition, I think we should. You can think that we shouldn’t have more people.

But when the government doesn’t respect the law, that is a clear signal to people that they don’t have to either. And there is a reason that the government doesn’t respect the law. That’s why we are trying to change it to bring law in touch with reality.

By: Rachel

Rachel — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 16:22:12 +0000

Before market forces and any forgiveness, is the rule of law.

That people, who have been ordered by a court of law to be deported, will have that forgiven is so insane.

I’m christian, but I’m not that forgiving.