<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Romney soft-selling the war?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sorendayton.com/2007/06/06/romney-soft-selling-the-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/06/06/romney-soft-selling-the-war/</link>
	<description>Merely an aggregation of a dispersed life online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:32:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eyeon08.com &#187; Romney continues to back away from Iraq</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/06/06/romney-soft-selling-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1718</link>
		<dc:creator>eyeon08.com &#187; Romney continues to back away from Iraq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 14:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/06/06/romney-soft-selling-the-war/#comment-1718</guid>
		<description>[...] As I indicated earlier in the week, this is a political strategy with an eye on the general. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I indicated earlier in the week, this is a political strategy with an eye on the general. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CKMacLeod</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/06/06/romney-soft-selling-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1717</link>
		<dc:creator>CKMacLeod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/06/06/romney-soft-selling-the-war/#comment-1717</guid>
		<description>Nicely observed - I&#039;ve been watching this for months.  Romney supporters (some of whom style themselves as security-first voters) counter that their candidate&#039;s understanding of the larger context is superior to everyone else&#039;s, and certainly to the Democrats&#039; - cuz Romney&#039;s read more books (and not just sciento-fi).  In short, Romney seems to be attempting to preserve his strategic flexibility, and it&#039;s hard to fault him for embracing that option when he&#039;ll never get to the right on the war past McCain and Giuliani, or make a more convincing presentation as a &quot;wartime leader.&quot;  It&#039;s also possible, after all, that the Republicans will be better served by a candidate who can run on something other than the war on terror.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely observed &#8211; I&#8217;ve been watching this for months.  Romney supporters (some of whom style themselves as security-first voters) counter that their candidate&#8217;s understanding of the larger context is superior to everyone else&#8217;s, and certainly to the Democrats&#8217; &#8211; cuz Romney&#8217;s read more books (and not just sciento-fi).  In short, Romney seems to be attempting to preserve his strategic flexibility, and it&#8217;s hard to fault him for embracing that option when he&#8217;ll never get to the right on the war past McCain and Giuliani, or make a more convincing presentation as a &#8220;wartime leader.&#8221;  It&#8217;s also possible, after all, that the Republicans will be better served by a candidate who can run on something other than the war on terror.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

