<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Romney&#8217;s new Iowa numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sorendayton.com/2007/05/20/romneys-new-iowa-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/05/20/romneys-new-iowa-numbers/</link>
	<description>Merely an aggregation of a dispersed life online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:32:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eyeon08.com &#187; Romney&#8217;s tele-townhall&#8217;s and moving numbers</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/05/20/romneys-new-iowa-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1589</link>
		<dc:creator>eyeon08.com &#187; Romney&#8217;s tele-townhall&#8217;s and moving numbers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 19:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/05/20/romneys-new-iowa-numbers/#comment-1589</guid>
		<description>[...] Romney&#8217;s tele-townhall&#8217;s and moving numbers   digg_url = &#039;http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/06/05/romneys-tele-townhalls-and-moving-numbers/&#039;;   digg_title = &#039;Romney&#8217;s tele-townhall&#8217;s and moving numbers&#039;;   digg_bodytext = &#039;Marc Ambinder has an interesting post about Romney&#8217;s performance in Iowa. He argues that voter contact is what is moving the numbers. I have made a similar argument in the past. InMuscatine recently participated in one of the tele-townhalls in which Romney answers questions for about a while. After talking to some people in Iowa [...]&#039;;   digg_skin = &quot;compact&quot;;  digg_topic = &quot;politics&quot;;   ( function() { var ds=typeof digg_skin==&#039;string&#039;?digg_skin:&#039;&#039;; var h=80; var w=52; if(ds==&#039;compact&#039;) { h=18; w=120; } var u=typeof digg_url==&#039;string&#039;?digg_url:(typeof DIGG_URL==&#039;string&#039;?DIGG_URL:window.location.href); document.write(&quot;&quot;); } )()  Marc Ambinder has an interesting post about Romney&#8217;s performance in Iowa. He argues that voter contact is what is moving the numbers. I have made a similar argument in the past. InMuscatine recently participated in one of the tele-townhalls in which Romney answers questions for about a while. After talking to some people in Iowa recently, I was struck by this part of his post: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Romney&#8217;s tele-townhall&#8217;s and moving numbers   digg_url = &#8216;<a href="http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/06/05/romneys-tele-townhalls-and-moving-numbers/&#039;" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.eyeon08.com/2007/06/05/romneys-tele-townhalls-and-moving-numbers/_039?referer=');">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/06/05/romneys-tele-townhalls-and-moving-numbers/&#039;</a>;   digg_title = &#8216;Romney&#8217;s tele-townhall&#8217;s and moving numbers&#8217;;   digg_bodytext = &#8216;Marc Ambinder has an interesting post about Romney&#8217;s performance in Iowa. He argues that voter contact is what is moving the numbers. I have made a similar argument in the past. InMuscatine recently participated in one of the tele-townhalls in which Romney answers questions for about a while. After talking to some people in Iowa [...]&#8216;;   digg_skin = &#8220;compact&#8221;;  digg_topic = &#8220;politics&#8221;;   ( function() { var ds=typeof digg_skin==&#8217;string&#8217;?digg_skin:&#8221;; var h=80; var w=52; if(ds==&#8217;compact&#8217;) { h=18; w=120; } var u=typeof digg_url==&#8217;string&#8217;?digg_url:(typeof DIGG_URL==&#8217;string&#8217;?DIGG_URL:window.location.href); document.write(&#8220;&#8221;); } )()  Marc Ambinder has an interesting post about Romney&#8217;s performance in Iowa. He argues that voter contact is what is moving the numbers. I have made a similar argument in the past. InMuscatine recently participated in one of the tele-townhalls in which Romney answers questions for about a while. After talking to some people in Iowa recently, I was struck by this part of his post: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eye</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/05/20/romneys-new-iowa-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1588</link>
		<dc:creator>eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 03:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/05/20/romneys-new-iowa-numbers/#comment-1588</guid>
		<description>I am a Republican activist. I just find Romney very alarming and dangerous for our party.

We cannot afford to nominate someone with the character of Bill Clinton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Republican activist. I just find Romney very alarming and dangerous for our party.</p>
<p>We cannot afford to nominate someone with the character of Bill Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cwpete</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/05/20/romneys-new-iowa-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1587</link>
		<dc:creator>cwpete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 02:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/05/20/romneys-new-iowa-numbers/#comment-1587</guid>
		<description>I’m absolutely ecstatic that Romney is out polling Rudy &amp; McCain with or without FDT &amp; Newt in the early primary states. I very pleased that many are now seeing in Mitt what I’ve already seen.  The man is smart, competent, articulate, a serious problem solver, and very presidential.
I am amazed by the vitriol spewed at Romney. Not just from Democrats, but by fellow Republicans. I may not agree with Rudy’s social liberalism or with McCain’s immigration policy, but I’d vote for both of them should they be our nominee. I can’t help but think that many here would never vote for Romney under any circumstances.  This site in particular has been overly heavy-handed and critical of most things Romney.  I’ve assume this is a site run by liberals.
I’m very excited that the media and others are paying more attention to Romney as they ought to. Romney will out fund raise for Q2. His organization will continue to grow and reap more dividends. You are only seeing the beginning here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m absolutely ecstatic that Romney is out polling Rudy &amp; McCain with or without FDT &amp; Newt in the early primary states. I very pleased that many are now seeing in Mitt what I’ve already seen.  The man is smart, competent, articulate, a serious problem solver, and very presidential.<br />
I am amazed by the vitriol spewed at Romney. Not just from Democrats, but by fellow Republicans. I may not agree with Rudy’s social liberalism or with McCain’s immigration policy, but I’d vote for both of them should they be our nominee. I can’t help but think that many here would never vote for Romney under any circumstances.  This site in particular has been overly heavy-handed and critical of most things Romney.  I’ve assume this is a site run by liberals.<br />
I’m very excited that the media and others are paying more attention to Romney as they ought to. Romney will out fund raise for Q2. His organization will continue to grow and reap more dividends. You are only seeing the beginning here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eye</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/05/20/romneys-new-iowa-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1586</link>
		<dc:creator>eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 01:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/05/20/romneys-new-iowa-numbers/#comment-1586</guid>
		<description>His foot is permanently in his mouth. He has no character and no values.

Eventually truth wins in politics. And when it does, Romney will lose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His foot is permanently in his mouth. He has no character and no values.</p>
<p>Eventually truth wins in politics. And when it does, Romney will lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjalder26</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/05/20/romneys-new-iowa-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1585</link>
		<dc:creator>bjalder26</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 01:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/05/20/romneys-new-iowa-numbers/#comment-1585</guid>
		<description>I suspect Romney&#039;s Iowa numbers will only go up.  He&#039;s a brilliant campaigner, the kind of guy who can change minds through good ideas and clarity of thought.  I have to wonder though why Romney is the first to campaign so effectively.  It begs the question, what is wrong with our lifetime politicians.  I think it shows that they aren’t as effective at organizing people and solving real world problems.  Thank goodness, they will lose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect Romney&#8217;s Iowa numbers will only go up.  He&#8217;s a brilliant campaigner, the kind of guy who can change minds through good ideas and clarity of thought.  I have to wonder though why Romney is the first to campaign so effectively.  It begs the question, what is wrong with our lifetime politicians.  I think it shows that they aren’t as effective at organizing people and solving real world problems.  Thank goodness, they will lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

