<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Romney buying more straw polls?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sorendayton.com/2007/04/23/romney-buying-more-straw-polls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/04/23/romney-buying-more-straw-polls/</link>
	<description>Merely an aggregation of a dispersed life online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:32:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eye</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/04/23/romney-buying-more-straw-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-1498</link>
		<dc:creator>eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/04/23/romney-buying-more-straw-polls/#comment-1498</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that it is inappropriate that one possible misleading statement should be an issue.

That is like saying, &quot;He only murdered once, but the rest of the time he is a fine guy.&quot;

It certainly looks like Mr. Slick shared information with someone who paid for the registrations. I have questions about that. It would be good to know what Mr. Slick says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that it is inappropriate that one possible misleading statement should be an issue.</p>
<p>That is like saying, &#8220;He only murdered once, but the rest of the time he is a fine guy.&#8221;</p>
<p>It certainly looks like Mr. Slick shared information with someone who paid for the registrations. I have questions about that. It would be good to know what Mr. Slick says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SC Conservative</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/04/23/romney-buying-more-straw-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-1497</link>
		<dc:creator>SC Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/04/23/romney-buying-more-straw-polls/#comment-1497</guid>
		<description>No matter what happened here, no one is going to get a fair shake in the race for headlines.  Just look at the blogosphere and see who is really telling the whole story.

I e-mailed the original author of the Salon piece--with a copy of my cancelled check and here&#039;s what he said:

&quot;Thanks for the note. I am not sure how I am going to follow up on this, but I appreciate the information.

I certainly did not mean to suggest, nor do I think I did, that all or even most of Romney&#039;s support comes from arranging payment of delegate fees, and I have no reason to doubt Mr. Slick&#039;s motives. I think the article makes clear that all the campaigns, including Cox&#039;s sleazy flier, should be looked at with some suspicion for dirty tricks. I included this anectdote as one of many about the trickiness of politics in South Carolina. &quot;

Interesting how a mere &#039;anecdote&#039; turns into a headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter what happened here, no one is going to get a fair shake in the race for headlines.  Just look at the blogosphere and see who is really telling the whole story.</p>
<p>I e-mailed the original author of the Salon piece&#8211;with a copy of my cancelled check and here&#8217;s what he said:</p>
<p>&#8220;Thanks for the note. I am not sure how I am going to follow up on this, but I appreciate the information.</p>
<p>I certainly did not mean to suggest, nor do I think I did, that all or even most of Romney&#8217;s support comes from arranging payment of delegate fees, and I have no reason to doubt Mr. Slick&#8217;s motives. I think the article makes clear that all the campaigns, including Cox&#8217;s sleazy flier, should be looked at with some suspicion for dirty tricks. I included this anectdote as one of many about the trickiness of politics in South Carolina. &#8221;</p>
<p>Interesting how a mere &#8216;anecdote&#8217; turns into a headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eye</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/04/23/romney-buying-more-straw-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-1495</link>
		<dc:creator>eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/04/23/romney-buying-more-straw-polls/#comment-1495</guid>
		<description>I am not saying that the people were not sincere. But Chris Slick&#039;s statement makes clear that he knows the people who paid for people.

Lynch&#039;s statement makes it clear that, if the Romney campaign did not pay for Lynch&#039;s registration, that information was given by the Romney campaign to someone else. That person then acted on behalf of the Romney campaign. Is that action disclosed? Is that even legal? How many are we talking about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not saying that the people were not sincere. But Chris Slick&#8217;s statement makes clear that he knows the people who paid for people.</p>
<p>Lynch&#8217;s statement makes it clear that, if the Romney campaign did not pay for Lynch&#8217;s registration, that information was given by the Romney campaign to someone else. That person then acted on behalf of the Romney campaign. Is that action disclosed? Is that even legal? How many are we talking about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SC Conservative</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/04/23/romney-buying-more-straw-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-1496</link>
		<dc:creator>SC Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/04/23/romney-buying-more-straw-polls/#comment-1496</guid>
		<description>Would you like a real source on this issue? I was recruited by Chris Slick--Romney&#039;s operative--to attend the Greenville GOP convention, and I paid for my own registration. I’d be happy to e-mail a copy of the cancelled check. I can also vouch that anyone else he recruited was a solid grass-roots supporter of Governor Romney–both before and after the convention.

Most of these people simply didn’t know how the process worked and so Romney’s campaign helped explain the process so that we could get involved. As a result of attending, my wife and I were able to volunteer to assist with future elections at our precinct.

Was there “vote buying”? NO! Was there “delegate sponsoring”? Probably, but that’s not why Romney won the straw poll. He won it because he gave the best speech, has the strongest grassroots organization in the state, and his supporters are enthusiastic about his message.

By the way, has anyone actually looked into the process of qualifying to be a delegate at a straw poll in Greenville County? You have to have voted in the republican primary in 2006, attend your precinct reorganization meeting, or attended the make-up reorganization meeting (which I did)–in addition to paying a mere $15 to help support the local GOP. In other words, it cost me 7 hours of my time to be a delegate (regardless of the $15 dollars).

You would have to be an idiot to think that Romney’s win was by anything other than a dedicated grassroots support as it becomes clear that the cost in time is much more costly than the registration fee!

I only wish normal voting required so much civic sacrifice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you like a real source on this issue? I was recruited by Chris Slick&#8211;Romney&#8217;s operative&#8211;to attend the Greenville GOP convention, and I paid for my own registration. I’d be happy to e-mail a copy of the cancelled check. I can also vouch that anyone else he recruited was a solid grass-roots supporter of Governor Romney–both before and after the convention.</p>
<p>Most of these people simply didn’t know how the process worked and so Romney’s campaign helped explain the process so that we could get involved. As a result of attending, my wife and I were able to volunteer to assist with future elections at our precinct.</p>
<p>Was there “vote buying”? NO! Was there “delegate sponsoring”? Probably, but that’s not why Romney won the straw poll. He won it because he gave the best speech, has the strongest grassroots organization in the state, and his supporters are enthusiastic about his message.</p>
<p>By the way, has anyone actually looked into the process of qualifying to be a delegate at a straw poll in Greenville County? You have to have voted in the republican primary in 2006, attend your precinct reorganization meeting, or attended the make-up reorganization meeting (which I did)–in addition to paying a mere $15 to help support the local GOP. In other words, it cost me 7 hours of my time to be a delegate (regardless of the $15 dollars).</p>
<p>You would have to be an idiot to think that Romney’s win was by anything other than a dedicated grassroots support as it becomes clear that the cost in time is much more costly than the registration fee!</p>
<p>I only wish normal voting required so much civic sacrifice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

