<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Romney attacks Rudy&#8217;s family</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sorendayton.com/2007/03/31/romney-attacks-rudys-family/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/03/31/romney-attacks-rudys-family/</link>
	<description>Merely an aggregation of a dispersed life online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:32:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cbs</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/03/31/romney-attacks-rudys-family/comment-page-1/#comment-1430</link>
		<dc:creator>cbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 02:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/03/31/romney-attacks-rudys-family/#comment-1430</guid>
		<description>This is a relatively pointless issue and I feel silly still engaging with you on this but you&#039;re obtuseness on this point is bothersome.

Romney gave a straightforward, inoffensive answer to this question.  He did not go &quot;out of his way to make a contrast.&quot;  This is a yes or no question.  You either will or you won&#039;t have your wife sit in cabinet meetings.  Romney is in the no camp.  Again, he was asked this question, he didn&#039;t raise it on his own.

Romney is not responsible for what Dean Barnett thinks or writes.  Nor is he responsible for what other supporters say on the issue.

You, however, are responsible for writing an unfair and misleading post about Romney.  That&#039;s the only &quot;nonsense&quot; I&#039;m seeing around here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a relatively pointless issue and I feel silly still engaging with you on this but you&#8217;re obtuseness on this point is bothersome.</p>
<p>Romney gave a straightforward, inoffensive answer to this question.  He did not go &#8220;out of his way to make a contrast.&#8221;  This is a yes or no question.  You either will or you won&#8217;t have your wife sit in cabinet meetings.  Romney is in the no camp.  Again, he was asked this question, he didn&#8217;t raise it on his own.</p>
<p>Romney is not responsible for what Dean Barnett thinks or writes.  Nor is he responsible for what other supporters say on the issue.</p>
<p>You, however, are responsible for writing an unfair and misleading post about Romney.  That&#8217;s the only &#8220;nonsense&#8221; I&#8217;m seeing around here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eye</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/03/31/romney-attacks-rudys-family/comment-page-1/#comment-1429</link>
		<dc:creator>eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 11:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/03/31/romney-attacks-rudys-family/#comment-1429</guid>
		<description>Nonsense. Romney went way out of his way to make a contrast. And then his driver said something way out of line. And then Evangelicals for Mitt continued with the sliming.

Not cool. The right answer to a question like that is much more like, &quot;Ann is my partner, and she will certainly advise me.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nonsense. Romney went way out of his way to make a contrast. And then his driver said something way out of line. And then Evangelicals for Mitt continued with the sliming.</p>
<p>Not cool. The right answer to a question like that is much more like, &#8220;Ann is my partner, and she will certainly advise me.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cbs</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/03/31/romney-attacks-rudys-family/comment-page-1/#comment-1428</link>
		<dc:creator>cbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 04:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/03/31/romney-attacks-rudys-family/#comment-1428</guid>
		<description>You lose all credibility with misleading posts like this.  Have you actually watched the clip you&#039;re referring to?  In no way, shape, or form was Romney &quot;attacking&quot; Rudy or his family.  Romney was asked a specific question as to whether his wife would sit in on cabinet meetings.  He answered, very politely, that  no she would not.  So are you saying the only way he could have answered this question so as not to attack Giuliani would have been to answer yes?  That&#039;s absurd.

Just like all the other candidates, Romney has issues for which he can be legitimately criticized.  This, however, is not one of them.  Instead, posts like this are little more than childish hackery on your part and do not help your reputation at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You lose all credibility with misleading posts like this.  Have you actually watched the clip you&#8217;re referring to?  In no way, shape, or form was Romney &#8220;attacking&#8221; Rudy or his family.  Romney was asked a specific question as to whether his wife would sit in on cabinet meetings.  He answered, very politely, that  no she would not.  So are you saying the only way he could have answered this question so as not to attack Giuliani would have been to answer yes?  That&#8217;s absurd.</p>
<p>Just like all the other candidates, Romney has issues for which he can be legitimately criticized.  This, however, is not one of them.  Instead, posts like this are little more than childish hackery on your part and do not help your reputation at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: University Update</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/03/31/romney-attacks-rudys-family/comment-page-1/#comment-1427</link>
		<dc:creator>University Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/03/31/romney-attacks-rudys-family/#comment-1427</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Romney attacks Rudy’s family...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Romney attacks Rudy’s family&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cwpete</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/03/31/romney-attacks-rudys-family/comment-page-1/#comment-1426</link>
		<dc:creator>cwpete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 15:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/03/31/romney-attacks-rudys-family/#comment-1426</guid>
		<description>You guys are losers.  Mitt is right on this 100%.  I did  not like much when Hillary was with Bill in most his meetings directing &amp; creating policy.  How is it that this should be any different here?

In fact, if you would read the news, Rudy is already flopping on that statement:

&quot;Republican presidential contender Rudy Giuliani said Friday his wife will not be a member of his Cabinet or attend most high-level meetings as he sought to clarify his previous statements suggesting she would play a significant role in his administration.&quot;

Can this site for once admit that Mitt is right?  For once?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are losers.  Mitt is right on this 100%.  I did  not like much when Hillary was with Bill in most his meetings directing &amp; creating policy.  How is it that this should be any different here?</p>
<p>In fact, if you would read the news, Rudy is already flopping on that statement:</p>
<p>&#8220;Republican presidential contender Rudy Giuliani said Friday his wife will not be a member of his Cabinet or attend most high-level meetings as he sought to clarify his previous statements suggesting she would play a significant role in his administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Can this site for once admit that Mitt is right?  For once?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

