<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Romney not making sense (telling lies?) about Tsongas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sorendayton.com/2007/02/16/romney-not-making-sense-telling-lies-about-tsongas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/02/16/romney-not-making-sense-telling-lies-about-tsongas/</link>
	<description>Merely an aggregation of a dispersed life online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:32:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eyeon08.com &#187; Mitt&#8217;s three-step on taxes</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/02/16/romney-not-making-sense-telling-lies-about-tsongas/comment-page-1/#comment-1880</link>
		<dc:creator>eyeon08.com &#187; Mitt&#8217;s three-step on taxes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/02/16/romney-not-making-sense-telling-lies-about-tsongas/#comment-1880</guid>
		<description>[...] eyeon08.com Watching the 2008 pre-election     &#171; Romney not making sense (telling lies?) about Tsongas [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] eyeon08.com Watching the 2008 pre-election     &laquo; Romney not making sense (telling lies?) about Tsongas [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eye</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/02/16/romney-not-making-sense-telling-lies-about-tsongas/comment-page-1/#comment-1879</link>
		<dc:creator>eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/02/16/romney-not-making-sense-telling-lies-about-tsongas/#comment-1879</guid>
		<description>This is not true. There were three people on the ballot in the 1992 MA GOP Presidential primary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not true. There were three people on the ballot in the 1992 MA GOP Presidential primary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mymanmitt</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/02/16/romney-not-making-sense-telling-lies-about-tsongas/comment-page-1/#comment-1878</link>
		<dc:creator>mymanmitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 14:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/02/16/romney-not-making-sense-telling-lies-about-tsongas/#comment-1878</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s been a good deal of controversy around Mitt&#039;s appearance on This Week this weekend and his explanation for voting for Tsongas in 1992. This is really a pithy issue.

Let&#039;s detail a few things here. (Many thanks for our man at MittBase for his detailed research on the issue)

First, there is nothing contradictory here. We have a report from two Boston Globe employees as to why Romney voted for someone 15 years ago. There is no direct quote.

Second, I bet if you asked Scott Lehigh, Frank Phillips, or Mitt Romney that those weren??™t the only reasons why Romney voted for Tsongas (the fact that Tsongas was from Massachusetts, and that he was better than Bill Clinton). Do you vote for someone because of only two issues? You might only give two issues, when you have limited time, but no one votes for a candidate because of only two issues.

Third, why don??™t we take Romney at his word. He voted for Paul Tsongas because he liked him better than Clinton, and that he didn??™t think that he would win the general election against Bush? Are these somehow mutually exclusive.

Fourth, the democrats and MSM is going to take everything Romney ever said 10 years ago, tell us it, and then say &quot;however today he says...&quot; blank. They are going to use this tactic weather it contradicted the previous statement or not. They will use this tactic every time Mitt Romney does not repeat his previous statement verbatim.

Lastly, there was NO GOP PRIMARY in 1992. There was only one place to vote. As one political guru told me &quot;he does it all the time&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been a good deal of controversy around Mitt&#8217;s appearance on This Week this weekend and his explanation for voting for Tsongas in 1992. This is really a pithy issue.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s detail a few things here. (Many thanks for our man at MittBase for his detailed research on the issue)</p>
<p>First, there is nothing contradictory here. We have a report from two Boston Globe employees as to why Romney voted for someone 15 years ago. There is no direct quote.</p>
<p>Second, I bet if you asked Scott Lehigh, Frank Phillips, or Mitt Romney that those weren??™t the only reasons why Romney voted for Tsongas (the fact that Tsongas was from Massachusetts, and that he was better than Bill Clinton). Do you vote for someone because of only two issues? You might only give two issues, when you have limited time, but no one votes for a candidate because of only two issues.</p>
<p>Third, why don??™t we take Romney at his word. He voted for Paul Tsongas because he liked him better than Clinton, and that he didn??™t think that he would win the general election against Bush? Are these somehow mutually exclusive.</p>
<p>Fourth, the democrats and MSM is going to take everything Romney ever said 10 years ago, tell us it, and then say &#8220;however today he says&#8230;&#8221; blank. They are going to use this tactic weather it contradicted the previous statement or not. They will use this tactic every time Mitt Romney does not repeat his previous statement verbatim.</p>
<p>Lastly, there was NO GOP PRIMARY in 1992. There was only one place to vote. As one political guru told me &#8220;he does it all the time&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

