<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Romney&#8217;s new approach on abortion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sorendayton.com/2007/01/30/romneys-new-approach-on-abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/01/30/romneys-new-approach-on-abortion/</link>
	<description>Merely an aggregation of a dispersed life online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:32:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Right&#8217;s Field &#187; Romney&#8217;s New Approach? Honesty</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/01/30/romneys-new-approach-on-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-1843</link>
		<dc:creator>The Right&#8217;s Field &#187; Romney&#8217;s New Approach? Honesty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/01/30/romneys-new-approach-on-abortion/#comment-1843</guid>
		<description>[...] Via Soren Dayton, we learn that Mitt Romney has finally admitted that he used to be pro-choice. I noticed this in the coverage of Romney&#8217;s visit to South Carolina and then again in his Nightline appearance. He is more clearly coming out and saying that he had been pro-choice. This is clearly an attempt defuse the issue. First Nightline: We all learn from experience. And I&#8217;m just like other people in this nation. Not everything I believed 12 or 13 years ago is the same today, with regards to the issue of abortion. And so about two years ago, I said I am pro-life. And prior to that time, I had a different position. This is a much cleaner and simpler position than he had previously. Apparently, he was asked about this in South Carolina too. He said: &#8220;Over the last multiple years, as you know, I have been effectively pro-choice,&#8221; he said. &#8220;I never called myself that as a label but I was effectively pro-choice and that followed a personal experience in my extended family that led to that conclusion.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via Soren Dayton, we learn that Mitt Romney has finally admitted that he used to be pro-choice. I noticed this in the coverage of Romney&#8217;s visit to South Carolina and then again in his Nightline appearance. He is more clearly coming out and saying that he had been pro-choice. This is clearly an attempt defuse the issue. First Nightline: We all learn from experience. And I&#8217;m just like other people in this nation. Not everything I believed 12 or 13 years ago is the same today, with regards to the issue of abortion. And so about two years ago, I said I am pro-life. And prior to that time, I had a different position. This is a much cleaner and simpler position than he had previously. Apparently, he was asked about this in South Carolina too. He said: &#8220;Over the last multiple years, as you know, I have been effectively pro-choice,&#8221; he said. &#8220;I never called myself that as a label but I was effectively pro-choice and that followed a personal experience in my extended family that led to that conclusion.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emboldened &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Romney&#8217;s New Approach? Honesty</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2007/01/30/romneys-new-approach-on-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-1842</link>
		<dc:creator>Emboldened &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Romney&#8217;s New Approach? Honesty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/01/30/romneys-new-approach-on-abortion/#comment-1842</guid>
		<description>[...] Via Soren Dayton, we learn that Mitt Romney has finally admitted that he used to be pro-choice. I noticed this in the coverage of Romney&#8217;s visit to South Carolina and then again in his Nightline appearance. He is more clearly coming out and saying that he had been pro-choice. This is clearly an attempt defuse the issue. First Nightline: We all learn from experience. And I&#8217;m just like other people in this nation. Not everything I believed 12 or 13 years ago is the same today, with regards to the issue of abortion. And so about two years ago, I said I am pro-life. And prior to that time, I had a different position. This is a much cleaner and simpler position than he had previously. Apparently, he was asked about this in South Carolina too. He said: &#8220;Over the last multiple years, as you know, I have been effectively pro-choice,&#8221; he said. &#8220;I never called myself that as a label but I was effectively pro-choice and that followed a personal experience in my extended family that led to that conclusion.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via Soren Dayton, we learn that Mitt Romney has finally admitted that he used to be pro-choice. I noticed this in the coverage of Romney&#8217;s visit to South Carolina and then again in his Nightline appearance. He is more clearly coming out and saying that he had been pro-choice. This is clearly an attempt defuse the issue. First Nightline: We all learn from experience. And I&#8217;m just like other people in this nation. Not everything I believed 12 or 13 years ago is the same today, with regards to the issue of abortion. And so about two years ago, I said I am pro-life. And prior to that time, I had a different position. This is a much cleaner and simpler position than he had previously. Apparently, he was asked about this in South Carolina too. He said: &#8220;Over the last multiple years, as you know, I have been effectively pro-choice,&#8221; he said. &#8220;I never called myself that as a label but I was effectively pro-choice and that followed a personal experience in my extended family that led to that conclusion.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

