Comments on: The Romney attack on Brownback http://sorendayton.com/2007/01/29/the-romney-attack-on-brownback/ Merely an aggregation of a dispersed life online Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:32:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: race42008.com » Blog Archive » Romney Inncorrectly Says Bush Was Once Pro-Choice http://sorendayton.com/2007/01/29/the-romney-attack-on-brownback/comment-page-1/#comment-1841 race42008.com » Blog Archive » Romney Inncorrectly Says Bush Was Once Pro-Choice Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:56:05 +0000 http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/01/29/the-romney-attack-on-brownback/#comment-1841 [...] As Soren Dayton said, there are two issues involved with Mitt’s conversion; recency and genuineness. Not only was Romney “effectively pro-choice” as little as 2 years ago, but he was vehemently pro-choice. He told NARAL in 2002 that they “need someone like me in Washington.” Not to mention the fact that he angrily denied getting the endorsement from Massachusetts Citizens for Life. This is why I have such a hard time believing his conversion story. He advocated fiercely on behalf of the pro-choice movement, but then suddenly has a complete turn around after the November 2004 stem cell meeting. [...] [...] As Soren Dayton said, there are two issues involved with Mitt’s conversion; recency and genuineness. Not only was Romney “effectively pro-choice” as little as 2 years ago, but he was vehemently pro-choice. He told NARAL in 2002 that they “need someone like me in Washington.” Not to mention the fact that he angrily denied getting the endorsement from Massachusetts Citizens for Life. This is why I have such a hard time believing his conversion story. He advocated fiercely on behalf of the pro-choice movement, but then suddenly has a complete turn around after the November 2004 stem cell meeting. [...]

]]> By: Romney Inncorrectly Says Bush Was Once Pro-Choice at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source. http://sorendayton.com/2007/01/29/the-romney-attack-on-brownback/comment-page-1/#comment-1840 Romney Inncorrectly Says Bush Was Once Pro-Choice at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source. Sat, 24 Feb 2007 22:47:17 +0000 http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/01/29/the-romney-attack-on-brownback/#comment-1840 [...] As Soren Dayton said, there are two issues involved with Mitt’s conversion; recency and genuineness. Not only was Romney “effectively pro-choice” as little as 2 years ago, but he was vehemently pro-choice. He told NARAL in 2002 that they “need someone like me in Washington.” Not to mention the fact that he angrily denied getting the endorsement from Massachusetts Citizens for Life. This is why I have such a hard time believing his conversion story. He advocated fiercely on behalf of the pro-choice movement, but then suddenly has a complete turn around after the November 2004 stem cell meeting. [...] [...] As Soren Dayton said, there are two issues involved with Mitt’s conversion; recency and genuineness. Not only was Romney “effectively pro-choice” as little as 2 years ago, but he was vehemently pro-choice. He told NARAL in 2002 that they “need someone like me in Washington.” Not to mention the fact that he angrily denied getting the endorsement from Massachusetts Citizens for Life. This is why I have such a hard time believing his conversion story. He advocated fiercely on behalf of the pro-choice movement, but then suddenly has a complete turn around after the November 2004 stem cell meeting. [...]

]]> By: Carol McKinley http://sorendayton.com/2007/01/29/the-romney-attack-on-brownback/comment-page-1/#comment-1839 Carol McKinley Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:25:23 +0000 http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/01/29/the-romney-attack-on-brownback/#comment-1839 Justin, It's not going to fly any more than the gadfly. I don't know who is giving the Mittster his political strategy but - whoever it is, is an idiot. You think the prolife community doesn't know the difference between Brownback who has been physically present and Romney who hasn't? Check the internet today - your man mitt is toast. His publicity stunt didn't go off so well in D.C. this weekend. Being a prolifer is not something you can fake in person. Sound bytes in the newspapers can only go so far. Here's quote the Boston Globe of about Romney's lack of prolife work as of July 3, 2005: "Similarly, a leading antiabortion group is puzzled: ''We honestly don't know where he stands on this issue," said Marie Sturgis, executive director and legislative director for Massachusetts Citizens for Life." Sturgis, of the Massachusetts Citizens for Life, said Romney does not have regular contacts with her group. ''If we could, we would," Sturgis said. When he ran for governor in 2002, she said, her group considered him an abortion rights supporter; Romney declined to complete the Citizens for Life questionnaire Justin,

It’s not going to fly any more than the gadfly. I don’t know who is giving the Mittster his political strategy but – whoever it is, is an idiot.

You think the prolife community doesn’t know the difference between Brownback who has been physically present and Romney who hasn’t?

Check the internet today – your man mitt is toast. His publicity stunt didn’t go off so well in D.C. this weekend. Being a prolifer is not something you can fake in person. Sound bytes in the newspapers can only go so far.

Here’s quote the Boston Globe of about Romney’s lack of prolife work as of July 3, 2005:

“Similarly, a leading antiabortion group is puzzled: ”We honestly don’t know where he stands on this issue,” said Marie Sturgis, executive director and legislative director for Massachusetts Citizens for Life.”

Sturgis, of the Massachusetts Citizens for Life, said Romney does not have regular contacts with her group. ”If we could, we would,” Sturgis said. When he ran for governor in 2002, she said, her group considered him an abortion rights supporter; Romney declined to complete the Citizens for Life questionnaire

]]> By: Carol McKinley http://sorendayton.com/2007/01/29/the-romney-attack-on-brownback/comment-page-1/#comment-1838 Carol McKinley Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:58:39 +0000 http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/01/29/the-romney-attack-on-brownback/#comment-1838 The minutia of reasons why less than a handful of the conservative good old boy network in Massachusetts is supporting Romney has yet to be divulged. Suffice it to say - in 2005 in the Boston Globe, the Mass Citizens for Life made a statement regarding Romney's prolife record. There was none. From Mitt, there was no contact with any prolifers, no work with any prolifers, no presence with any prolifers whatsoever. In fact, if you google Marie Sturgis Mass Citizens for Life 2005 - you will come up with her statement that conveys is absent and unaccounted for and as a result of the actions he was taking that injured Catholics in Massachusetts, and his absence of record in the prolife network - Mass Citizens for Life considers Romney a proabort. Take also into consideration the following: Though Romney says he is against the use of embryos for stem cell research - - if you dig under the surface to google, you will come up with his actual policy on stem cell research. So long as the embryos are extra, he is not against their destruction to harvest stem cells for use, including cloning. Now, on the face of that statement - when one with intellect ponders what exactly he means - - the fact of the matter is ALL EMBRYOS which have ever been and ever will be used for stem cell research hanging around in laboratories are "extra". Therefore, there isn't a cell in Massachusetts that Romney would object to destroying and using for stem cell research. In other words - Women in Massachusetts are not being pumped up with estrogens and impregnated to produce multiple embryos and are presenting themselves at laboratories on day 13 so the mad scientists can retreive their embryos for the sake of stem cell research. Romney is the master of deception. The minutia of reasons why less than a handful of the conservative good old boy network in Massachusetts is supporting Romney has yet to be divulged.

Suffice it to say – in 2005 in the Boston Globe, the Mass Citizens for Life made a statement regarding Romney’s prolife record. There was none. From Mitt, there was no contact with any prolifers, no work with any prolifers, no presence with any prolifers whatsoever. In fact, if you google Marie Sturgis Mass Citizens for Life 2005 – you will come up with her statement that conveys is absent and unaccounted for and as a result of the actions he was taking that injured Catholics in Massachusetts, and his absence of record in the prolife network – Mass Citizens for Life considers Romney a proabort.

Take also into consideration the following:

Though Romney says he is against the use of embryos for stem cell research – - if you dig under the surface to google, you will come up with his actual policy on stem cell research. So long as the embryos are extra, he is not against their destruction to harvest stem cells for use, including cloning.

Now, on the face of that statement – when one with intellect ponders what exactly he means – - the fact of the matter is ALL EMBRYOS which have ever been and ever will be used for stem cell research hanging around in laboratories are “extra”. Therefore, there isn’t a cell in Massachusetts that Romney would object to destroying and using for stem cell research.

In other words – Women in Massachusetts are not being pumped up with estrogens and impregnated to produce multiple embryos and are presenting themselves at laboratories on day 13 so the mad scientists can retreive their embryos for the sake of stem cell research.

Romney is the master of deception.

]]> By: justin@mymanmitt.com http://sorendayton.com/2007/01/29/the-romney-attack-on-brownback/comment-page-1/#comment-1837 justin@mymanmitt.com Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:43:26 +0000 http://www.eyeon08.com/2007/01/29/the-romney-attack-on-brownback/#comment-1837 You're welcome to take issue with the attack. All that I've heard is 1) Romney admits he was pro-choice and that he is now pro-life and 2) Brownback has been pro-life but refused to call himself that in 1994. Political expediency is fine in my book. Just own up to it. If you want to hear Romney's pro-life journey in your own words. Here you go: <a HREF="http://www.mymanmitt.com/2007/01/video-mitt-romney-on-abortion.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.mymanmitt.com/2007/01/video-mitt-romney-on-abortion.asp</a> You’re welcome to take issue with the attack. All that I’ve heard is 1) Romney admits he was pro-choice and that he is now pro-life and 2) Brownback has been pro-life but refused to call himself that in 1994. Political expediency is fine in my book. Just own up to it.

If you want to hear Romney’s pro-life journey in your own words. Here you go:
http://www.mymanmitt.com/2007/01/video-mitt-romney-on-abortion.asp

]]>