<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Romney losing support in Michigan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sorendayton.com/2006/12/29/romney-losing-support-in-michigan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sorendayton.com/2006/12/29/romney-losing-support-in-michigan/</link>
	<description>Merely an aggregation of a dispersed life online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:32:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankle Biting Pundits &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Huh?</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2006/12/29/romney-losing-support-in-michigan/comment-page-1/#comment-2112</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankle Biting Pundits &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Huh?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 19:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2006/12/29/romney-losing-support-in-michigan/#comment-2112</guid>
		<description>[...] Hugh asks: â€œWhere are the specifics? Which â€˜bloggerâ€™ circulated the CBN report? Was it by chance Patrick Hynes, which would be a story in itself?â€ Er, couldnâ€™t Hugh have asked me? I mean, to put this all in context, Hugh was criticizing Mr. Helmanâ€™s reporting on the New Media; for not squaring the circle, not chasing down leads. Meanwhile he asks an open, accusatory question such as that? The answer is no, by the way: I havenâ€™t â€œcirculatedâ€ the story about Romney losing support because of his flip-flopping on social issues. Shoot, I donâ€™t even live in Washington. I live in New Hampshire. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hugh asks: â€œWhere are the specifics? Which â€˜bloggerâ€™ circulated the CBN report? Was it by chance Patrick Hynes, which would be a story in itself?â€ Er, couldnâ€™t Hugh have asked me? I mean, to put this all in context, Hugh was criticizing Mr. Helmanâ€™s reporting on the New Media; for not squaring the circle, not chasing down leads. Meanwhile he asks an open, accusatory question such as that? The answer is no, by the way: I havenâ€™t â€œcirculatedâ€ the story about Romney losing support because of his flip-flopping on social issues. Shoot, I donâ€™t even live in Washington. I live in New Hampshire. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Tale of Two Polls at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2006/12/29/romney-losing-support-in-michigan/comment-page-1/#comment-2111</link>
		<dc:creator>A Tale of Two Polls at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 04:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2006/12/29/romney-losing-support-in-michigan/#comment-2111</guid>
		<description>[...] The question is, which of these polls are right and how could they get such different results? If we assume that the ARG poll is more realistic, that means that Hillary is in a much more comfortable position than I expected and so is McCain. The big losers of the ARG poll have to be Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. Romney doesn&#8217;t even break 10% in any of the 4 states and he is tied with Chuck Hagel (!) in Iowa, is somehow at 5% in South Carolina despite spending the a lot of time in the state this past year, and only hits 9% in NH where he has higher name ID than any other primary state besides Michigan (but even his support among conservatives there is slipping fast). Ouch. As for the Research 2000 polls, they seem to be an outlier and before last week I had never heard of them and I&#8217;m an avid 2008 poll watcher&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The question is, which of these polls are right and how could they get such different results? If we assume that the ARG poll is more realistic, that means that Hillary is in a much more comfortable position than I expected and so is McCain. The big losers of the ARG poll have to be Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. Romney doesn&#8217;t even break 10% in any of the 4 states and he is tied with Chuck Hagel (!) in Iowa, is somehow at 5% in South Carolina despite spending the a lot of time in the state this past year, and only hits 9% in NH where he has higher name ID than any other primary state besides Michigan (but even his support among conservatives there is slipping fast). Ouch. As for the Research 2000 polls, they seem to be an outlier and before last week I had never heard of them and I&#8217;m an avid 2008 poll watcher&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: race42008.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Tale of Two Polls</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2006/12/29/romney-losing-support-in-michigan/comment-page-1/#comment-2110</link>
		<dc:creator>race42008.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Tale of Two Polls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 04:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2006/12/29/romney-losing-support-in-michigan/#comment-2110</guid>
		<description>[...] The question is, which of these polls are right and how could they get such different results? If we assume that the ARG poll is more realistic, that means that Hillary is in a much more comfortable position than I expected and so is McCain. The big losers of the ARG poll have to be Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. Romney doesn&#8217;t even break 10% in any of the 4 states and he is tied with Chuck Hagel (!) in Iowa, is somehow at 5% in South Carolina despite spending the a lot of time in the state this past year, and only hits 9% in NH where he has higher name ID than any other primary state besides Michigan (but even his support among conservatives there is slipping fast). Ouch. As for the Research 2000 polls, they seem to be an outlier and before last week I had never heard of them and I&#8217;m an avid 2008 poll watcher&#8230;     by LJ  @ 11:27 pm. Filed under Uncategorized     &#160;&#160;[Trackback URL]&#160;&#160;[link] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The question is, which of these polls are right and how could they get such different results? If we assume that the ARG poll is more realistic, that means that Hillary is in a much more comfortable position than I expected and so is McCain. The big losers of the ARG poll have to be Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. Romney doesn&#8217;t even break 10% in any of the 4 states and he is tied with Chuck Hagel (!) in Iowa, is somehow at 5% in South Carolina despite spending the a lot of time in the state this past year, and only hits 9% in NH where he has higher name ID than any other primary state besides Michigan (but even his support among conservatives there is slipping fast). Ouch. As for the Research 2000 polls, they seem to be an outlier and before last week I had never heard of them and I&#8217;m an avid 2008 poll watcher&#8230;     by LJ  @ 11:27 pm. Filed under Uncategorized     &nbsp;&nbsp;[Trackback URL]&nbsp;&nbsp;[link] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some Michigander&#8217;s are re-thinking their support for Romney &#171; Swing State</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2006/12/29/romney-losing-support-in-michigan/comment-page-1/#comment-2109</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Michigander&#8217;s are re-thinking their support for Romney &#171; Swing State</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 23:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2006/12/29/romney-losing-support-in-michigan/#comment-2109</guid>
		<description>[...] Some Michigander&#8217;s are re-thinking their support for&#160;Romney  I foundÂ this post over at Eye on 08&#8242;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some Michigander&#8217;s are re-thinking their support for&nbsp;Romney  I foundÂ this post over at Eye on 08&#8242;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Right&#8217;s Field &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Romney Losing Conservative Support in Michigan</title>
		<link>http://sorendayton.com/2006/12/29/romney-losing-support-in-michigan/comment-page-1/#comment-2108</link>
		<dc:creator>The Right&#8217;s Field &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Romney Losing Conservative Support in Michigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeon08.com/2006/12/29/romney-losing-support-in-michigan/#comment-2108</guid>
		<description>[...] Soren Dayton picked up on a Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN) news report that the Massachusetts governor is losing support in Michigan from Republican members of the State House. There are at least four Republican Representatives from the Michigan State House that are seriously rethinking their support of Romney for President. These are members of Romneyâ€™s steering committee in Michigan who are now having reservations about recent revelations about Romneyâ€™s past comments in regards to marriage, abortion and the Boy Scouts. [emphasis from Soren Dayton] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Soren Dayton picked up on a Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN) news report that the Massachusetts governor is losing support in Michigan from Republican members of the State House. There are at least four Republican Representatives from the Michigan State House that are seriously rethinking their support of Romney for President. These are members of Romneyâ€™s steering committee in Michigan who are now having reservations about recent revelations about Romneyâ€™s past comments in regards to marriage, abortion and the Boy Scouts. [emphasis from Soren Dayton] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

